Book Revisited Pick #4: Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones
Amy chose our Book Club Revisited read for August, and she picked a children's "classic": Diana Wynne Jones's Howl's Moving Castle. It was an interesting choice, in that all of us seemed to drag our feet a bit when it came to actually picking up the book and reading it (or didn't read it at all, i.e. Corey). Amy herself said the book wasn't at all what she was expecting, although Mike and I were a bit more enthusiastic about the story.
Despite the book's genuine weirdness, Jones does some really interesting things with this narrative. At the beginning, 17-year-old Sophie is cursed to be an old woman by the Witch of the Waste. Hoping to beat the curse, Sophie journeys away from her family hat shop and encounters the titular moving castle, owned by the simultaneously charming and cold wizard Howl Jenkins. Howl has struck an agreement with a fire demon named Calcifer, and they live in the castle with Howl's apprentice, the kind-hearted Michael. A lot of weird and convoluted adventures happen, lives are imperiled, and hearts are won. I had a little trouble following the plot at times, but the strength of the characters - Sophie and Howl in particular - made up for the structural shortcomings.
Our club found the book a little hard to discuss. I'm not sure why we had so much trouble finding interesting things to say about Howl's Moving Castle, but alas so it was. (Admittedly, our giddiness - a book club trait that is always getting us into trouble - did not help matters). We all agreed that there is something kind of fascinating about this material, and we all had trouble believing that this book could actually be considered a children's book rather than a YA novel.
Personally, I am obsessed with some of the romance novel tropes Jones is playing with here, although I don't think she meant to do such a thing. Howl is a very typical romance novel hero, just a few years younger. He's a little cold-hearted but also charms the pants off women. He loves his family but is also unsure of his place in their lives. He has a love/hate relationship with the heroine (Sophie). He is "reformed" (kind of) by the end. Sophie defies the romance heroine type because of her old-age curse and prickly personality, but by the end, she's fulfilled the dutiful heroine role of reformer-of-man. To see this all happen in a kid's book kind of blew my mind, to be honest. I will definitely be giving it more thought throughout the future.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: It's Corey's turn again, and he chose Karen Thompson Walker's new book, The Age of Miracles. I'm excited, as I was planning to read it anyway. We also added an additional goal of discussing the film Melancholia, as it shares some end-of-the-world themes with Walker's book. Should be a good time.
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Could Have Used More Changlings
Book Reviewed: Some Kind of Fairy Tale, by Graham Joyce
When I was a kid, I hated fantasy. I had absolutely no tolerance for magic or mysticism or anything that wasn't completely tactile. Sure, I could watch a Disney movie and be perfectly happy. But when it came to playing or reading, it was reality or nothing. I realize now just how weird that is. Most people enjoy fantasy as children and then grow out of it. Instead, I grew into an appreciation for the fantastical after college. After discovering a love for urban fantasy and mash-ups (in particular, Neil Gaiman's novels for both adults and children), I began to open up to the genre a bit more.
That being said, there are some fantasy tropes I will never love. One of those is the idea of fairies. They bore me, and the whole concept always creeps up on the border of being cutesy. So when I read a good review for Graham Joyce's new book, Some Kind of Fairy Tale, I assumed it wouldn't be for me. After all, this book is deep in the fairy stuff. But the fact that the book was about the aftermath of a tragic disappearance got to me, and I went ahead and read it in a couple days. And while I actually did like the book, I had this weird feeling that my worst beliefs in the silliness of fairy-fantasies might just still hold true.
Here's the problem. In blending the almost-boring realm of domesticity with the out-there fantasy world of woodland sprites, Joyce is attempting to say all sorts of semi-profound things about humaniy. But in the long run, I am always going to be more interested in the domestic. As a kid who used to re-enact the most boring scenes from film and television (the part of Mister Rogers where he changes his sweater, the opening of The Little Mermaid where Sebastian lays out his music score on a rock), I am still more interested in the emotional significance of the day-to-day drama of human life than I am in the strange things we can't actually see. It's not that I don't like a touch of supernatural in my life (I am all for ghosts and Harry Potter and whatnot), but the fantasy has to be interesting to me. And again, fairies just aren't interesting in Bethland.
Some Kind of Fairy Tale begins with the return of Tara, who disappeared as a teenager twenty years earlier. She comes back to her parents and now middle-aged brother, Peter, looking almost exactly the same as she did two decades ago. She was kidnapped by fairies, she claims. And now she's back. The book deals with this dramatic return in a fairly realistic way - Tara's parents are glad she's back and are trying to avoid the drama of knowing where she really was, Peter is concerned about the truth and takes his sister to a psychiatrist. The relationships between people really count here, especially Tara and Peter's relationship with Richie, a down-and-out musician who once dated Tara and was Peter's best friend before her disappearance. Richie is the book's most interesting character (although I quite liked Peter as well), although Joyce doesn't flesh him out as much as I would have liked.
Joyce does do a few interesting things here. For one, he never tells the reader what to think or believe, which adds genuine tension to the plot. He also does a good job in using Peter's family life as an entry point for the story. His son Jack plays an important role as a kind of reader/writer surrogate, and by making Peter a farrier who lives in a cottage, Joyce gets extra mileage in his concept of the modern fairy tale. Most importantly, he makes a sort of beautiful and unsaid claim at the end about what the passage of time does to the ones we love. Every body changes, and if you don't see someone for a long period of time, even a lover or child or friend can become a complete stranger. Strangely enough, I think Joyce could have used the idea of a changling - a creature taking the place of a real person, also related to fairy legend - to a larger degree. He makes the point quite well, but the book's ending left me feeling a little unsure of what just happened. I wanted more closure, and I can't decide if Joyce should have given it to us or not.
This book is so close to being really good and original, but it never quites get there. Joyce uses too many points-of-view, too many voices to get his story across. And by making Tara so mysterious, he makes her a bit annoying as a character. We can't know her because to know her would be to figure her out, and the story won't let that happen. I think the things Joyce does well - the domestic stuff, the theme of loved ones changing over time, etc - he does really well. I just wish the book had felt a little more substantial by the end. I think I've had my fill of fairies for awhile.
When I was a kid, I hated fantasy. I had absolutely no tolerance for magic or mysticism or anything that wasn't completely tactile. Sure, I could watch a Disney movie and be perfectly happy. But when it came to playing or reading, it was reality or nothing. I realize now just how weird that is. Most people enjoy fantasy as children and then grow out of it. Instead, I grew into an appreciation for the fantastical after college. After discovering a love for urban fantasy and mash-ups (in particular, Neil Gaiman's novels for both adults and children), I began to open up to the genre a bit more.
That being said, there are some fantasy tropes I will never love. One of those is the idea of fairies. They bore me, and the whole concept always creeps up on the border of being cutesy. So when I read a good review for Graham Joyce's new book, Some Kind of Fairy Tale, I assumed it wouldn't be for me. After all, this book is deep in the fairy stuff. But the fact that the book was about the aftermath of a tragic disappearance got to me, and I went ahead and read it in a couple days. And while I actually did like the book, I had this weird feeling that my worst beliefs in the silliness of fairy-fantasies might just still hold true.
Here's the problem. In blending the almost-boring realm of domesticity with the out-there fantasy world of woodland sprites, Joyce is attempting to say all sorts of semi-profound things about humaniy. But in the long run, I am always going to be more interested in the domestic. As a kid who used to re-enact the most boring scenes from film and television (the part of Mister Rogers where he changes his sweater, the opening of The Little Mermaid where Sebastian lays out his music score on a rock), I am still more interested in the emotional significance of the day-to-day drama of human life than I am in the strange things we can't actually see. It's not that I don't like a touch of supernatural in my life (I am all for ghosts and Harry Potter and whatnot), but the fantasy has to be interesting to me. And again, fairies just aren't interesting in Bethland.
Some Kind of Fairy Tale begins with the return of Tara, who disappeared as a teenager twenty years earlier. She comes back to her parents and now middle-aged brother, Peter, looking almost exactly the same as she did two decades ago. She was kidnapped by fairies, she claims. And now she's back. The book deals with this dramatic return in a fairly realistic way - Tara's parents are glad she's back and are trying to avoid the drama of knowing where she really was, Peter is concerned about the truth and takes his sister to a psychiatrist. The relationships between people really count here, especially Tara and Peter's relationship with Richie, a down-and-out musician who once dated Tara and was Peter's best friend before her disappearance. Richie is the book's most interesting character (although I quite liked Peter as well), although Joyce doesn't flesh him out as much as I would have liked.
Joyce does do a few interesting things here. For one, he never tells the reader what to think or believe, which adds genuine tension to the plot. He also does a good job in using Peter's family life as an entry point for the story. His son Jack plays an important role as a kind of reader/writer surrogate, and by making Peter a farrier who lives in a cottage, Joyce gets extra mileage in his concept of the modern fairy tale. Most importantly, he makes a sort of beautiful and unsaid claim at the end about what the passage of time does to the ones we love. Every body changes, and if you don't see someone for a long period of time, even a lover or child or friend can become a complete stranger. Strangely enough, I think Joyce could have used the idea of a changling - a creature taking the place of a real person, also related to fairy legend - to a larger degree. He makes the point quite well, but the book's ending left me feeling a little unsure of what just happened. I wanted more closure, and I can't decide if Joyce should have given it to us or not.
This book is so close to being really good and original, but it never quites get there. Joyce uses too many points-of-view, too many voices to get his story across. And by making Tara so mysterious, he makes her a bit annoying as a character. We can't know her because to know her would be to figure her out, and the story won't let that happen. I think the things Joyce does well - the domestic stuff, the theme of loved ones changing over time, etc - he does really well. I just wish the book had felt a little more substantial by the end. I think I've had my fill of fairies for awhile.
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This Week in Trashy Reads 2012 #7
Trashy Read 2012 #7: Practice Makes Perfect, by Julie James
I’ve been watching a lot of TV shows about lawyers lately, so it only makes sense that I would choose to read a Julie James book as my next romance. James was a lawyer before she began writing screenplays and novels, and almost all of her books feature lawyers (and the one book that doesn’t feature a lawyer protagonist, A Lot Like Love, still revolves around a legal case). James has gotten a lot of love in the contemporary romance world for writing books that feature adults with real jobs and actual common sense. Also, she’s great at banter. Her characters always act as if they’ve stepped right off a screen, walking and talking and trading insults and innuendos with one another.
I’ve been watching a lot of TV shows about lawyers lately, so it only makes sense that I would choose to read a Julie James book as my next romance. James was a lawyer before she began writing screenplays and novels, and almost all of her books feature lawyers (and the one book that doesn’t feature a lawyer protagonist, A Lot Like Love, still revolves around a legal case). James has gotten a lot of love in the contemporary romance world for writing books that feature adults with real jobs and actual common sense. Also, she’s great at banter. Her characters always act as if they’ve stepped right off a screen, walking and talking and trading insults and innuendos with one another.
Practice Makes Perfect was James’s second novel, one that I
hadn’t previously gotten around to reading.
It features that much-beloved trope of the relationship that begins with
hate and ends with true love. Payton and
J.D. both work at a big-deal Chicago law firm, and both of them expect to make
partner within the next few weeks.
Despite working together for eight years, they strongly dislike one
another, constantly bickering out of ear’s reach of their coworkers. Then they find out that the firm has decided
to only make one of them partner, despite pairing them up together in order to
win over a major new client. Obviously,
this means Payton and J.D. become even more competitive, which is inconvenient
in light of the fact they are both gaining more respect for each other.
I liked Practice Makes Perfect quite a bit. It’s funny and breezy, and the central plot
of the partnership is an actual conflict that doesn’t seem designed solely to
keep our couple apart for a few more pages.
You can actually imagine that this is the kind of thing that would be
detrimental to a burgeoning relationship, one that the characters genuinely
care about. Once again, James has
created characters who have a real problem that they try to solve in
both a professionally- and emotionally-sound way. Yes, there is a great deal of reader wish-fulfillment
happening here (these characters are smart, attractive, have good jobs, and are
absolutely loaded), but the story isn’t designed to be anything more than
breezy summer fare anyway. And that’s
exactly what it was for me.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Poetry Round-Up
Books Reviewed: The Trees The Trees, by Heather Christle; Thin Kimono, by Michael Earl Craig; I [Heart] Your Fate, by Anthony McCann
I read so much poetry these days that I can't possibly blog about each book. So every once in a while, I do these round-ups to let you know what I've been reading lately. Here are three books I've read in the last couple weeks:
The Trees The Trees: After reading and loving Christle's The Difficult Farm a couple weeks ago, I gave another of her books a try. And of course, I really liked it. I'm not sure The Trees The Trees is quite as surprising or charming as The Difficult Farm, but the way it teases out an idiosyncratic voice through the pages of prose poems is really cool. Again, I find Christle to be a warm and available poetic voice, one that I will probably be recommending to those who think contemporary poetry has gotten overly cold in its obsession with being clever. Poems I particularly liked here: "Anywhere in Particular," "A Handle on It," "Line Up in an Orderly Fashion," "Landscaping," "I Know the Air Should Not Contain Me," and "Trying to Return the Sun."
Thin Kimono: Another book from the pile my friend Drew left for me this summer. Craig is definitely unlike any other poet out there right now, probably because he lives and works in Montana as a farrier. He has a very plain, conversant style, one which spins out poems as if they were folk stories. On the surface, what could look like a prosaic quality is actually quite robust in its ability to do that which makes good poetry - to convey many things, to carry many ideas, in a handful of lines. Thin Kimono is unlike anything else I've read this summer, which is good. I need some change in my life. Poems I particularly liked here: "Bluebirds," "When It's Time," "Bubbles Came from Their Noses," "Games in the Sand," and "City at Night."
I [Heart] Your Fate: Again, another book by an author I read and liked earlier this summer (in this case, the earlier book was McCann's Father of Noise). I [Heart] Your Fate was particularly hit and miss for me. I really liked some of the poems, I instantly forgot some of the others; this dynamic is defining my relationship with McCann, I think. I did gain a new appreciation for McCann's style here, though. He has a sense of sound, of how a line works with the one before and after it, that is quite masterful. This is particularly on display in the long poems in the middle of the book, which have a wonderful rhythm to them. Poems I particularly liked here: "Field Work," "Letters of Claire and Trelawny," "Deseret," "Mammal Island," and "More Dreams of Waking."
I read so much poetry these days that I can't possibly blog about each book. So every once in a while, I do these round-ups to let you know what I've been reading lately. Here are three books I've read in the last couple weeks:
The Trees The Trees: After reading and loving Christle's The Difficult Farm a couple weeks ago, I gave another of her books a try. And of course, I really liked it. I'm not sure The Trees The Trees is quite as surprising or charming as The Difficult Farm, but the way it teases out an idiosyncratic voice through the pages of prose poems is really cool. Again, I find Christle to be a warm and available poetic voice, one that I will probably be recommending to those who think contemporary poetry has gotten overly cold in its obsession with being clever. Poems I particularly liked here: "Anywhere in Particular," "A Handle on It," "Line Up in an Orderly Fashion," "Landscaping," "I Know the Air Should Not Contain Me," and "Trying to Return the Sun."
Thin Kimono: Another book from the pile my friend Drew left for me this summer. Craig is definitely unlike any other poet out there right now, probably because he lives and works in Montana as a farrier. He has a very plain, conversant style, one which spins out poems as if they were folk stories. On the surface, what could look like a prosaic quality is actually quite robust in its ability to do that which makes good poetry - to convey many things, to carry many ideas, in a handful of lines. Thin Kimono is unlike anything else I've read this summer, which is good. I need some change in my life. Poems I particularly liked here: "Bluebirds," "When It's Time," "Bubbles Came from Their Noses," "Games in the Sand," and "City at Night."
I [Heart] Your Fate: Again, another book by an author I read and liked earlier this summer (in this case, the earlier book was McCann's Father of Noise). I [Heart] Your Fate was particularly hit and miss for me. I really liked some of the poems, I instantly forgot some of the others; this dynamic is defining my relationship with McCann, I think. I did gain a new appreciation for McCann's style here, though. He has a sense of sound, of how a line works with the one before and after it, that is quite masterful. This is particularly on display in the long poems in the middle of the book, which have a wonderful rhythm to them. Poems I particularly liked here: "Field Work," "Letters of Claire and Trelawny," "Deseret," "Mammal Island," and "More Dreams of Waking."
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Poetry Round-Up
Books Reviewed: Duties of an English Foreign Secretary, b Macgregor Card; The Difficult Farm, by Heather Christle; The Cloud Corporation, by Timothy Donnelly; Nick Demske, by Nick Demske
I read so much poetry these days that I can't possibly blog about each book. So every once in a while, I do these round-ups to let you know what I've been reading lately. Here are three books I've read in the last couple weeks:
Duties of an English Foreign Secretary: I picked this up at AWP based solely on the awesome title. I liked the book, although I didn't necessarily love it. Reading the poems aloud actually helped me enjoy them more, as Card has a wonderful sense of sound/music. The poems manage to be contemporary and old-timey at the same time, as if they were written on a sepia-toned word processor. I tended to like the poems when they were at their most varied, as I don't have the patience for some of the repetition Card uses here. Overall, though, a pretty enjoyable read. Poems I particularly liked here: "I Am the Teacher of Athletes," "To Friend-Tree of Counted Days," "The Libertine's Punishment," "Together We Shall Win the Title of Bluebeard," and "Shipfilm."
The Difficult Farm: I had never heard of Christle until I picked up The Difficult Farm last week from the pile of books my friend Drew assigned to me over the summer. I'm glad I read it. I really liked this book. The poems are weird and funny and occasionally beautiful. There's a real warmth in Christle's work that I find lacking in a lot of contemporary poetry. Poems I particularly liked here: "Variations on an Animal Kingdom," "What an Undertaker Does to His Family at Night," "Cocorico," "Because the Limit Seeks Its Own," and "Wilderness with Two Men."
The Cloud Corporation: This is a long poetry book, coming in at almost 150 pages. It's easy to see why it's so long once you encounter Donnelly's verbosity. Donnelly is clearly a poet who loves words and ideas and teasing out the impossible logic of a thought. He's a "thinking" poet, whatever I mean by that. Sometimes, this makes for some delightfully smart reading. At other times, it made me a little sleepy. There was a time when I probably would have been more of a Donnelly fan, but my taste in poetry (particularly my recent obsession with brevity and my newfound love of style/tone/mood) has changed a lot the last year. I would still recommend The Cloud Corporation, especially to die-hard poetry or language lovers, even if I wasn't always impressed by the sheer size and scope of it. Poems I particularly liked here: "The New Hymns," "Fun for the Shut-In," "His Apologia," "Globus Hystericus," and "Chapter for Not Dying Again."
Nick Demske: Okay, of these four books, this one is my least favorite. I really appreciate this book for existing. The way Demske uses sonnets (particularly his end-rhymes, which are genius) is kind of amazing. But I found I forgot a lot of the poems as soon as I finished them. Outside of a couple poems, it wasn't a book that will probably stick with me, unfortunately. Poems I particularly liked here: "Common Sense," "Put Your Face in My Tongue," "As a Dog Returneth to Vomit" (one of the better poems I've encountered about poetry-writing lately), "They All Lived," and "Fully Dressed in an Empty Bathtub."
I read so much poetry these days that I can't possibly blog about each book. So every once in a while, I do these round-ups to let you know what I've been reading lately. Here are three books I've read in the last couple weeks:
Duties of an English Foreign Secretary: I picked this up at AWP based solely on the awesome title. I liked the book, although I didn't necessarily love it. Reading the poems aloud actually helped me enjoy them more, as Card has a wonderful sense of sound/music. The poems manage to be contemporary and old-timey at the same time, as if they were written on a sepia-toned word processor. I tended to like the poems when they were at their most varied, as I don't have the patience for some of the repetition Card uses here. Overall, though, a pretty enjoyable read. Poems I particularly liked here: "I Am the Teacher of Athletes," "To Friend-Tree of Counted Days," "The Libertine's Punishment," "Together We Shall Win the Title of Bluebeard," and "Shipfilm."
The Difficult Farm: I had never heard of Christle until I picked up The Difficult Farm last week from the pile of books my friend Drew assigned to me over the summer. I'm glad I read it. I really liked this book. The poems are weird and funny and occasionally beautiful. There's a real warmth in Christle's work that I find lacking in a lot of contemporary poetry. Poems I particularly liked here: "Variations on an Animal Kingdom," "What an Undertaker Does to His Family at Night," "Cocorico," "Because the Limit Seeks Its Own," and "Wilderness with Two Men."
The Cloud Corporation: This is a long poetry book, coming in at almost 150 pages. It's easy to see why it's so long once you encounter Donnelly's verbosity. Donnelly is clearly a poet who loves words and ideas and teasing out the impossible logic of a thought. He's a "thinking" poet, whatever I mean by that. Sometimes, this makes for some delightfully smart reading. At other times, it made me a little sleepy. There was a time when I probably would have been more of a Donnelly fan, but my taste in poetry (particularly my recent obsession with brevity and my newfound love of style/tone/mood) has changed a lot the last year. I would still recommend The Cloud Corporation, especially to die-hard poetry or language lovers, even if I wasn't always impressed by the sheer size and scope of it. Poems I particularly liked here: "The New Hymns," "Fun for the Shut-In," "His Apologia," "Globus Hystericus," and "Chapter for Not Dying Again."
Nick Demske: Okay, of these four books, this one is my least favorite. I really appreciate this book for existing. The way Demske uses sonnets (particularly his end-rhymes, which are genius) is kind of amazing. But I found I forgot a lot of the poems as soon as I finished them. Outside of a couple poems, it wasn't a book that will probably stick with me, unfortunately. Poems I particularly liked here: "Common Sense," "Put Your Face in My Tongue," "As a Dog Returneth to Vomit" (one of the better poems I've encountered about poetry-writing lately), "They All Lived," and "Fully Dressed in an Empty Bathtub."
Thursday, July 19, 2012
What It Means to Survive
Book Reviewed: I'll Be There, by Holly Goldberg Sloan
I love young adult novels. I enjoy the emotional openness of them, the way they can take me away from my world and put me in a place of empathy towards their characters. Literary fiction is full of potholes on the road of enjoyment, with an author's desire to be clever often getting in the way. YA books, on the other hand, are all about feeling, about hitting all the raw nerves that teenagers walk around carrying. I like that, as I got into reading fiction for the emotional edification, not so I could see how smart a writer was. I like literary fiction and contemporary poetry. I like cleverness and intelligence and emotional avoidance sometimes. But every once in awhile, I just want to read something that was designed to make me feel.
Fortunately, one of my good friends is a youth librarian and keeps up on all the best new YA lit. I take her recommendations very seriously, so when she recommended I check out Holly Goldberg Sloan's I'll Be There, I paid attention. "It's about brothers," Amy said. She knows my weakness. I picked up the new paperback version of the book while out shopping last week, and I started it on a rainy afternoon a few days ago. As of yesterday, I was halfway through the book, with about 200 pages to go. I finished those 200 pages in a single sitting, not even getting up to use the bathroom or grab food. I was addicted.
Man, did I love I'll Be There. It hooked me from the first chapter and it just barrelled its way through the intense plot right up until the end. Sloan writes for television and film (she wrote Angels in the Outfield, which I adored as a kid), so it's not surprising that her first novel would feel so cinematic. I kept picturing the book as a movie while I was reading it, thinking about how I would go about casting it. It manages to be epic and personal at the same time.
At the beginning of the book, the Border brothers are struggling to survive, but it's a struggle they're used to. Their schizophrenic, terrifying father has shuttled them around the continent for the last decade, committing crimes and taking advantage of people. Older brother Sam is a talented musician who hasn't been to school in ten years and doesn't know much about the external world beyond what he directly experiences. Younger brother Riddle struggles with asthma and a socialization problem (a mild form of autism, maybe?) and relies on his big brother to keep him out of the hateful eye of his father. Then Sam and Riddle meet Emily Bell, a very normal girl with a very normal, loving family. Emily falls for Sam, and then the Bells fall for both the boys, taking them in as honorary family members. Unfortunately, the boys' father whisks his sons away without warning halfway through the book. Soon after, an accident occurs that leaves the Border brothers fighting for their lives in the wilds of Utah.
For the book's middle half, particularly the moments leading up to and directly following the plot-turning accident, I felt like my guts were being wrenched out a little bit more with each page. Despite knowing deep-down that things would turn out okay, I found so much of the story to be devastating. You have all these characters trying to do the right thing while hurting so much, missing the people they love. It's a book about survival - not just for the boys in the woods but also for the Bells, who are unable to do anything for two people they love. It's a book about feeling hopeless and hopeful all at the same time, and how painful that inbetween place can be. It's also a book about love and the way we can be saved by the people who care about us. The situations are extreme, but the emotional stakes are actually pretty familiar.
Sloan is a very simple writer, giving us the facts as we need them and letting every character - even minor ones - have a chance to explain themselves. The results of this relentlessly omniscient point-of-view are a little mixed. I actually could have done without seeing so much of Bobby Ellis, Emily's classmate and a minor character who gets a bigger role as the story goes on. I thought he was a little overused toward the end of the book, at a time when I only cared about what was going on with the Bells and Borders. And I'm not sure the book's final chapter is entirely earned, in which we get to see happy endings for a variety of characters who were given just a few scant paragraphs throughout the book. I was so touched by the relationships between Mrs. Bell and Riddle, Emily and Sam, and Sam and Riddle that I didn't want all the distractions of seeing other people's stories. I think this strange choice for the ending actually kept me from crying at the end of the book, which I spent the previous 100 pages assuming would be a given. That being said, I did get a little teary-eyed throughout the book, particularly when classically-good mom Mrs. Bell was thinking about her lost boys.
I highly recommend I'll Be There. It's a winner of book: fast-paced, deeply felt, entertaining and emotionally engaging all at once. I could not have been more involved with its characters and their struggles, which is the best thing I can say about any novel.
Note: This book works as a surprisingly nuanced look at class distinctions among teenagers, too. Class seems like such a hurdle when you're a teenager (or it did for me anyway; I was an incredibly class-conscious high schooler), but its actual marks are so subtle. Emily doesn't always understand the way Sam takes part in the world because she doesn't have access to the abject poverty that marks his life. Meanwhile, Sam seems to understand that there is something embarrassing about his situation in life, despite the fact that he doesn't actually have to face differences in a school setting. The book takes an extreme situation - the boys fighting for their lives vs. the ordered (though now-upsetting) life Emily faces day-to-day while they are missing - and makes it seem plausible because it's not that far apart from the actual realities of teenagers living in poverty coming into the lives of the comfortably middle-class and vice versa. I really appreciated the way class plays a part in the story but is completely unremarked upon.
I love young adult novels. I enjoy the emotional openness of them, the way they can take me away from my world and put me in a place of empathy towards their characters. Literary fiction is full of potholes on the road of enjoyment, with an author's desire to be clever often getting in the way. YA books, on the other hand, are all about feeling, about hitting all the raw nerves that teenagers walk around carrying. I like that, as I got into reading fiction for the emotional edification, not so I could see how smart a writer was. I like literary fiction and contemporary poetry. I like cleverness and intelligence and emotional avoidance sometimes. But every once in awhile, I just want to read something that was designed to make me feel.
Fortunately, one of my good friends is a youth librarian and keeps up on all the best new YA lit. I take her recommendations very seriously, so when she recommended I check out Holly Goldberg Sloan's I'll Be There, I paid attention. "It's about brothers," Amy said. She knows my weakness. I picked up the new paperback version of the book while out shopping last week, and I started it on a rainy afternoon a few days ago. As of yesterday, I was halfway through the book, with about 200 pages to go. I finished those 200 pages in a single sitting, not even getting up to use the bathroom or grab food. I was addicted.
Man, did I love I'll Be There. It hooked me from the first chapter and it just barrelled its way through the intense plot right up until the end. Sloan writes for television and film (she wrote Angels in the Outfield, which I adored as a kid), so it's not surprising that her first novel would feel so cinematic. I kept picturing the book as a movie while I was reading it, thinking about how I would go about casting it. It manages to be epic and personal at the same time.
At the beginning of the book, the Border brothers are struggling to survive, but it's a struggle they're used to. Their schizophrenic, terrifying father has shuttled them around the continent for the last decade, committing crimes and taking advantage of people. Older brother Sam is a talented musician who hasn't been to school in ten years and doesn't know much about the external world beyond what he directly experiences. Younger brother Riddle struggles with asthma and a socialization problem (a mild form of autism, maybe?) and relies on his big brother to keep him out of the hateful eye of his father. Then Sam and Riddle meet Emily Bell, a very normal girl with a very normal, loving family. Emily falls for Sam, and then the Bells fall for both the boys, taking them in as honorary family members. Unfortunately, the boys' father whisks his sons away without warning halfway through the book. Soon after, an accident occurs that leaves the Border brothers fighting for their lives in the wilds of Utah.
For the book's middle half, particularly the moments leading up to and directly following the plot-turning accident, I felt like my guts were being wrenched out a little bit more with each page. Despite knowing deep-down that things would turn out okay, I found so much of the story to be devastating. You have all these characters trying to do the right thing while hurting so much, missing the people they love. It's a book about survival - not just for the boys in the woods but also for the Bells, who are unable to do anything for two people they love. It's a book about feeling hopeless and hopeful all at the same time, and how painful that inbetween place can be. It's also a book about love and the way we can be saved by the people who care about us. The situations are extreme, but the emotional stakes are actually pretty familiar.
Sloan is a very simple writer, giving us the facts as we need them and letting every character - even minor ones - have a chance to explain themselves. The results of this relentlessly omniscient point-of-view are a little mixed. I actually could have done without seeing so much of Bobby Ellis, Emily's classmate and a minor character who gets a bigger role as the story goes on. I thought he was a little overused toward the end of the book, at a time when I only cared about what was going on with the Bells and Borders. And I'm not sure the book's final chapter is entirely earned, in which we get to see happy endings for a variety of characters who were given just a few scant paragraphs throughout the book. I was so touched by the relationships between Mrs. Bell and Riddle, Emily and Sam, and Sam and Riddle that I didn't want all the distractions of seeing other people's stories. I think this strange choice for the ending actually kept me from crying at the end of the book, which I spent the previous 100 pages assuming would be a given. That being said, I did get a little teary-eyed throughout the book, particularly when classically-good mom Mrs. Bell was thinking about her lost boys.
I highly recommend I'll Be There. It's a winner of book: fast-paced, deeply felt, entertaining and emotionally engaging all at once. I could not have been more involved with its characters and their struggles, which is the best thing I can say about any novel.
Note: This book works as a surprisingly nuanced look at class distinctions among teenagers, too. Class seems like such a hurdle when you're a teenager (or it did for me anyway; I was an incredibly class-conscious high schooler), but its actual marks are so subtle. Emily doesn't always understand the way Sam takes part in the world because she doesn't have access to the abject poverty that marks his life. Meanwhile, Sam seems to understand that there is something embarrassing about his situation in life, despite the fact that he doesn't actually have to face differences in a school setting. The book takes an extreme situation - the boys fighting for their lives vs. the ordered (though now-upsetting) life Emily faces day-to-day while they are missing - and makes it seem plausible because it's not that far apart from the actual realities of teenagers living in poverty coming into the lives of the comfortably middle-class and vice versa. I really appreciated the way class plays a part in the story but is completely unremarked upon.
Book Club Revisited: July 2012
Book Club Revisited Pick #3: Prepare to Die! by Paul Tobin
I got to choose our book club pick this time around, and I chose Paul Tobin's new, pulpy superhero novel, Prepare to Die! Luckily for me, the book turned out to be incredibly popular among my fellow Book Club Revisitors. Prepare to Die! is the story of a superhero, Reaver (who is so strong that when he punches someone, it actually ages them a year), who receives an ultimatum from the supervillain Octagon. When Octagon gives Reaver the requisite "prepare to die" sentence, Reaver asks for an extension. Octagon agrees to give Reaver two weeks to tie up loose ends, then Reaver must come meet his actual death. Reaver, still heartsick over the loss of his closest superhero friends as well as still dealing with the teenhood accident that gave him his powers, decides to make amends back in his hometown of Greenway, Oregon. There, he plans to reclaim an old relationship with Adele, the love of his life, who last saw him when they were teenagers.
Prepare to Die! hits a lot of the things I love in both literary fiction and superhero stories: the doomed protagonist, the allure of lost opportunities, grief over major losses. Best of all, it's a story about a superbeing who becomes a person again. After a decade spent fighting crime, he finds there are other parts of himself that are equally important to who he is, or as Tobin puts it when describing Reaver's past as a boyhood camper, "to keep a sense of the self even though the woods are very large and very lurking and he is very small and very unable to see himself or anything at all." It's a book about keeping one's sense of self, a concept that has led to tragedy for some of Reaver's friends but which might just hold the key to his redemption.
Tobin's book is not perfect. Adele's an underdeveloped character, and the writing isn't particularly pretty. But the story is funny, propulsive, and really entertaining. Occasionally, the book becomes incredibly moving. There's a revelation involving Reaver's brother that comes toward the end of the book that really startled and gutted all four of us BCR members. Our conversation about the book was very fruitful. At one point, we even got existential, trying to decide if people needed godlike figures (particularly represented by Reaver's best friend, the good and tragic Paladin) because facing one's own capacity for kindness or humanity or heroism is too frightening. Overall, it was another successful chapter in the story of our book club.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: Amy chose Howl's Moving Castle, a children's classic, for August's discussion. Should be fun!
I got to choose our book club pick this time around, and I chose Paul Tobin's new, pulpy superhero novel, Prepare to Die! Luckily for me, the book turned out to be incredibly popular among my fellow Book Club Revisitors. Prepare to Die! is the story of a superhero, Reaver (who is so strong that when he punches someone, it actually ages them a year), who receives an ultimatum from the supervillain Octagon. When Octagon gives Reaver the requisite "prepare to die" sentence, Reaver asks for an extension. Octagon agrees to give Reaver two weeks to tie up loose ends, then Reaver must come meet his actual death. Reaver, still heartsick over the loss of his closest superhero friends as well as still dealing with the teenhood accident that gave him his powers, decides to make amends back in his hometown of Greenway, Oregon. There, he plans to reclaim an old relationship with Adele, the love of his life, who last saw him when they were teenagers.
Prepare to Die! hits a lot of the things I love in both literary fiction and superhero stories: the doomed protagonist, the allure of lost opportunities, grief over major losses. Best of all, it's a story about a superbeing who becomes a person again. After a decade spent fighting crime, he finds there are other parts of himself that are equally important to who he is, or as Tobin puts it when describing Reaver's past as a boyhood camper, "to keep a sense of the self even though the woods are very large and very lurking and he is very small and very unable to see himself or anything at all." It's a book about keeping one's sense of self, a concept that has led to tragedy for some of Reaver's friends but which might just hold the key to his redemption.
Tobin's book is not perfect. Adele's an underdeveloped character, and the writing isn't particularly pretty. But the story is funny, propulsive, and really entertaining. Occasionally, the book becomes incredibly moving. There's a revelation involving Reaver's brother that comes toward the end of the book that really startled and gutted all four of us BCR members. Our conversation about the book was very fruitful. At one point, we even got existential, trying to decide if people needed godlike figures (particularly represented by Reaver's best friend, the good and tragic Paladin) because facing one's own capacity for kindness or humanity or heroism is too frightening. Overall, it was another successful chapter in the story of our book club.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: Amy chose Howl's Moving Castle, a children's classic, for August's discussion. Should be fun!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



