Book Reviewed: Gone Girl, by Gillian Flynn
This summer, Gone Girl was THE book to read. Every website, newspaper, and book critic threw praise at Flynn's domestic mystery novel, making it impossible to escape. After hearing a lot of people I trust tell me it was worth the praise, I finally started it in August. And just finished it yesterday. I know. School got in the way, as did work and book club and a million other things. But the real reason I didn't finish Gone Girl was because I kind of didn't want it to end. I wanted to just stay inside it for as long as I could while never actually committing to the bizarre plot twist it took halfway through.
It's hard to talk about Gone Girl without giving anything away, so this might be a short review. It's a great book: dark and mean and incredibly involving. Flynn hooks you right away with her charming (bordering on lulling at times) writing style and two characters who are full and complex but also feel like people you've known your whole life. Nick Dunne and his wife, Amy, seem like a couple I might consider friends, but as things in their lives unravel and their true sides show, they become the last people in the world you'd want to actually know. The book's first half revolves around Amy's disappearance on the Dunnes' fifth anniversary. Each chapter is told from either Nick's perspective from the day of the disappearance onward or from Amy's perspective through a diary that begins with the day she met Nick seven years earlier. Then the book takes a dark little turn halfway through and goes to a place I was not expecting at all. I am not easily fooled by narratives. I've been reading books and watching TV for far too long not to see endings coming from a mile away. But I was not expecting anything that happens in the last 200 pages or so of Gone Girl. Not even a little bit.
Gone Girl is not a comforting read, although I found Flynn's casual but tight style to be quite wonderful and involving. I do recommend it, though, if only for the roller coaster ride that is the plot. I also think Nick Dunne might be my favorite character I've encountered in literature in months. He is so similar to the actual Midwestern men I've known my entire life that I felt all his strengths and weaknesses (of which there are many) right in my gut. In fact, this book makes an interesting litmus test for how a reader might feel about the East Coast versus the Midwest. In the first 200 pages, who do you find more interesting: Amy or Nick? Answering that question eventually becomes problematic, but at first, I thought Flynn was creating one of the best books about regional perspectives that I've ever read. There's a lot going on in this book, and the idea of where we come from - place, family, past experiences - is maybe the most important trait of the entire story.
So if you have a chance to read Gone Girl, please do. And if you can avoid spoilers beforehand, please do. This story is best told fresh and without any expectations, so that you can't be disappointed. I can't say I loved this book completely (as I said, the weird twist almost got too weird for me), but I'd go out on a limb and say it's the most fascinating book I've read all year. There's no way this one's not making my Top Ten list for 2012.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Monday, October 15, 2012
Lindsey Buckingham, Genius
Book Reviewed: Tusk, by Rob Trucks (vol. 77 of the 33 1/3 series)
I love Fleetwood Mac. I mean, I really love Fleetwood Mac. When I was a kid, I remember watching The Dance tour live on TV and wanting to know more about this strange band with its apparent romantic entanglements, the self-mythos they scattered around themselves on stage. As I got older, I learned to appreciate the music for how pretty but robust it was. I listened to Rumours and thought I understood Fleetwood Mac as a band interested in melody first and last. But then I really listened to the song "Tusk" and realized I didn't know this band at all. Have you listened to "Tusk" lately? It's an incredibly weird little song. And it comes from an even weirder album.
When I saw that the 33 1/3 series, a brilliant little series of short books about famous or influential albums written by writers who aren't necessarily music journalists, had a volume on Tusk, I decided I had to read it. It made a nice antidote to the heavy poetry and theoretical lit stuff I have to read for school. Instead, it let me bask in the glow that is a mishmashed band making mishmashed music. Trucks's central premise is that Lindsey Buckingham is the real genius behind Fleetwood Mac and that Tusk is Buckingham's album more than a regular Fleetwood album. I don't think he's going to meet a lot of criticism on that point, although I might be biased. Buckingham isn't just my favorite member of Fleetwood Mac, he's one of my favorite rock stars period. (Note: If you have never heard the 1997 live version of "Big Love," then you are not a real person. That specific version of that song has been firmly in my Top 5 Favorite Songs of All Time list for years now).
Trucks admits from the book's first page that a hardcore fan of either Fleetwood Mac or the Tusk album will probably be disappointed by his presentation here. Trucks uses moments from his own life as a framework for his feelings toward Buckingham, the band, and the album. I have to admit that while I sometimes enjoyed Trucks's asides, I had a rather difficult time connecting them to the narrative at large (the narrative being that Tusk is secretly a stroke of genius and that the genius is all Buckingham's to own). Sometimes, things would just start getting interesting and then Trucks would break in and ruin the moment a bit. For that reason, I tended to most enjoy the "What We Talk About When We Talk About Tusk" chapters, in which other musicians (including a student from the USC marching band that played along on the original recording of the song "Tusk") talk about the album and the band. It's cool to see how many people the band has influenced over the years, particularly Buckingham. Wolf Parade's Dan Boeckner in particular said something that made me think about Buckingham in an all-new way:
Lindsey Buckinham has a way of putting together a song that's kind of heartbreaking...I think [his strength] is this unquantifiable way of delivering the melody and the words at the same time, so somehow the delivery and the timbre and the tonality of the voice and the way the notes are shaped and the way they break off, like in 'The Ledge,' you know, it sounds kind of fragile. And then he kind of pulls it back together. And these events just happen in microseconds. That's something that not a lot of performers have.
So while Tusk didn't always deliver the way I wanted it to, mainly due to Trucks's frequent diversions, I admit it made me appreciate Fleetwood Mac and their strangest album in a whole new way. And it reconfirmed my admiration of Lindsey Buckingham's contributions to one of my favorite bands.
Note: I know you're wondering what my 5 favorite Fleetwood Mac songs are. Here they are, folks: "Big Love," "Tusk," "Rhiannon," "Dreams," "The Ledge."
I love Fleetwood Mac. I mean, I really love Fleetwood Mac. When I was a kid, I remember watching The Dance tour live on TV and wanting to know more about this strange band with its apparent romantic entanglements, the self-mythos they scattered around themselves on stage. As I got older, I learned to appreciate the music for how pretty but robust it was. I listened to Rumours and thought I understood Fleetwood Mac as a band interested in melody first and last. But then I really listened to the song "Tusk" and realized I didn't know this band at all. Have you listened to "Tusk" lately? It's an incredibly weird little song. And it comes from an even weirder album.
When I saw that the 33 1/3 series, a brilliant little series of short books about famous or influential albums written by writers who aren't necessarily music journalists, had a volume on Tusk, I decided I had to read it. It made a nice antidote to the heavy poetry and theoretical lit stuff I have to read for school. Instead, it let me bask in the glow that is a mishmashed band making mishmashed music. Trucks's central premise is that Lindsey Buckingham is the real genius behind Fleetwood Mac and that Tusk is Buckingham's album more than a regular Fleetwood album. I don't think he's going to meet a lot of criticism on that point, although I might be biased. Buckingham isn't just my favorite member of Fleetwood Mac, he's one of my favorite rock stars period. (Note: If you have never heard the 1997 live version of "Big Love," then you are not a real person. That specific version of that song has been firmly in my Top 5 Favorite Songs of All Time list for years now).
Trucks admits from the book's first page that a hardcore fan of either Fleetwood Mac or the Tusk album will probably be disappointed by his presentation here. Trucks uses moments from his own life as a framework for his feelings toward Buckingham, the band, and the album. I have to admit that while I sometimes enjoyed Trucks's asides, I had a rather difficult time connecting them to the narrative at large (the narrative being that Tusk is secretly a stroke of genius and that the genius is all Buckingham's to own). Sometimes, things would just start getting interesting and then Trucks would break in and ruin the moment a bit. For that reason, I tended to most enjoy the "What We Talk About When We Talk About Tusk" chapters, in which other musicians (including a student from the USC marching band that played along on the original recording of the song "Tusk") talk about the album and the band. It's cool to see how many people the band has influenced over the years, particularly Buckingham. Wolf Parade's Dan Boeckner in particular said something that made me think about Buckingham in an all-new way:
Lindsey Buckinham has a way of putting together a song that's kind of heartbreaking...I think [his strength] is this unquantifiable way of delivering the melody and the words at the same time, so somehow the delivery and the timbre and the tonality of the voice and the way the notes are shaped and the way they break off, like in 'The Ledge,' you know, it sounds kind of fragile. And then he kind of pulls it back together. And these events just happen in microseconds. That's something that not a lot of performers have.
So while Tusk didn't always deliver the way I wanted it to, mainly due to Trucks's frequent diversions, I admit it made me appreciate Fleetwood Mac and their strangest album in a whole new way. And it reconfirmed my admiration of Lindsey Buckingham's contributions to one of my favorite bands.
Note: I know you're wondering what my 5 favorite Fleetwood Mac songs are. Here they are, folks: "Big Love," "Tusk," "Rhiannon," "Dreams," "The Ledge."
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Book Club Revisited: September 2012
Book Club Revisited Pick #5: The Age of Miracles, by Karen Thompson Walker
Corey chose this month's book, and he chose well. Karen Thompson Walker's debut novel, The Age of Miracles, was actually on my to-read list, so it felt nice to kill two birds with one stone (or book, if you will). All four of us members loved this book; it might be our favorite BCR read so far.
The Age of Miracles takes place during a time known as "the slowing," when earth's days start getting longer and longer with each passing moment. Day and night begin to mean very different things. People sleep when the sun is shining. "Real time" communes dedicated to following circadian rhythms rather than the more obtuse "clock time" spring up all across the country. The world is ending; everyone knows it and no one can do anything about it. But the book isn't worried about the world so much as it concerns itself with an adolescent girl whose normal concerns about friends and boys clash with her worries about death and decay. Narrator Julia is in middle school, and the title comes from the fact that Julia and her classmates are changing exponentially as human beings. It just so happens that the world around them is changing as well.
This is one heartbreaking little novel. Julia is likable, and it's hard to read her story and not remember an age when I too felt so terrified and lonely. Loneliness, in fact, is one of the major themes of this book. Being that I've been thinking about loneliness a lot lately, about how it is almost a personality trait more than a condition, Julia and her problems resonated deeply with me. When Julia strikes up a relationship with the mysterious and lovely Seth Moreno, you want to cheer for her. But then you remember what is happening around her - "gravity sickness" that might be fatal, the large-scale deaths of birds and whales, the fact that the prolonged sunlight is making people a little crazy. Nothing can be normal. Tragedy is waiting around every corner.
Walker's writing is strong, and her characters feel fleshed out without becoming heavy or taking the focus away from Julia. What amazes me about Walker's work here is the way she treads the line between sentimentality and cruelty. At every minute, things feel like they could be taken away. And yet we still feel comfortable enough with these characters and the graceful storytelling to continue to root for Julia, her family, and the disarming Seth. During our book club chat, all of admitted that we cried at some point. I actually managed to make it until the very last page of the book before I finally teared up. It's a quiet little book that tackles big subjects with just the right tone. I look forward to seeing what Walker does in the future.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: Mike picked Salman Rushdie's children's novel, Luka and the Fire of Life. I know absolutely nothing about this book, so it should be interesting.
Corey chose this month's book, and he chose well. Karen Thompson Walker's debut novel, The Age of Miracles, was actually on my to-read list, so it felt nice to kill two birds with one stone (or book, if you will). All four of us members loved this book; it might be our favorite BCR read so far.
The Age of Miracles takes place during a time known as "the slowing," when earth's days start getting longer and longer with each passing moment. Day and night begin to mean very different things. People sleep when the sun is shining. "Real time" communes dedicated to following circadian rhythms rather than the more obtuse "clock time" spring up all across the country. The world is ending; everyone knows it and no one can do anything about it. But the book isn't worried about the world so much as it concerns itself with an adolescent girl whose normal concerns about friends and boys clash with her worries about death and decay. Narrator Julia is in middle school, and the title comes from the fact that Julia and her classmates are changing exponentially as human beings. It just so happens that the world around them is changing as well.
This is one heartbreaking little novel. Julia is likable, and it's hard to read her story and not remember an age when I too felt so terrified and lonely. Loneliness, in fact, is one of the major themes of this book. Being that I've been thinking about loneliness a lot lately, about how it is almost a personality trait more than a condition, Julia and her problems resonated deeply with me. When Julia strikes up a relationship with the mysterious and lovely Seth Moreno, you want to cheer for her. But then you remember what is happening around her - "gravity sickness" that might be fatal, the large-scale deaths of birds and whales, the fact that the prolonged sunlight is making people a little crazy. Nothing can be normal. Tragedy is waiting around every corner.
Walker's writing is strong, and her characters feel fleshed out without becoming heavy or taking the focus away from Julia. What amazes me about Walker's work here is the way she treads the line between sentimentality and cruelty. At every minute, things feel like they could be taken away. And yet we still feel comfortable enough with these characters and the graceful storytelling to continue to root for Julia, her family, and the disarming Seth. During our book club chat, all of admitted that we cried at some point. I actually managed to make it until the very last page of the book before I finally teared up. It's a quiet little book that tackles big subjects with just the right tone. I look forward to seeing what Walker does in the future.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: Mike picked Salman Rushdie's children's novel, Luka and the Fire of Life. I know absolutely nothing about this book, so it should be interesting.
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Book Club Revisited: August 2012
Book Revisited Pick #4: Howl's Moving Castle, by Diana Wynne Jones
Amy chose our Book Club Revisited read for August, and she picked a children's "classic": Diana Wynne Jones's Howl's Moving Castle. It was an interesting choice, in that all of us seemed to drag our feet a bit when it came to actually picking up the book and reading it (or didn't read it at all, i.e. Corey). Amy herself said the book wasn't at all what she was expecting, although Mike and I were a bit more enthusiastic about the story.
Despite the book's genuine weirdness, Jones does some really interesting things with this narrative. At the beginning, 17-year-old Sophie is cursed to be an old woman by the Witch of the Waste. Hoping to beat the curse, Sophie journeys away from her family hat shop and encounters the titular moving castle, owned by the simultaneously charming and cold wizard Howl Jenkins. Howl has struck an agreement with a fire demon named Calcifer, and they live in the castle with Howl's apprentice, the kind-hearted Michael. A lot of weird and convoluted adventures happen, lives are imperiled, and hearts are won. I had a little trouble following the plot at times, but the strength of the characters - Sophie and Howl in particular - made up for the structural shortcomings.
Our club found the book a little hard to discuss. I'm not sure why we had so much trouble finding interesting things to say about Howl's Moving Castle, but alas so it was. (Admittedly, our giddiness - a book club trait that is always getting us into trouble - did not help matters). We all agreed that there is something kind of fascinating about this material, and we all had trouble believing that this book could actually be considered a children's book rather than a YA novel.
Personally, I am obsessed with some of the romance novel tropes Jones is playing with here, although I don't think she meant to do such a thing. Howl is a very typical romance novel hero, just a few years younger. He's a little cold-hearted but also charms the pants off women. He loves his family but is also unsure of his place in their lives. He has a love/hate relationship with the heroine (Sophie). He is "reformed" (kind of) by the end. Sophie defies the romance heroine type because of her old-age curse and prickly personality, but by the end, she's fulfilled the dutiful heroine role of reformer-of-man. To see this all happen in a kid's book kind of blew my mind, to be honest. I will definitely be giving it more thought throughout the future.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: It's Corey's turn again, and he chose Karen Thompson Walker's new book, The Age of Miracles. I'm excited, as I was planning to read it anyway. We also added an additional goal of discussing the film Melancholia, as it shares some end-of-the-world themes with Walker's book. Should be a good time.
Amy chose our Book Club Revisited read for August, and she picked a children's "classic": Diana Wynne Jones's Howl's Moving Castle. It was an interesting choice, in that all of us seemed to drag our feet a bit when it came to actually picking up the book and reading it (or didn't read it at all, i.e. Corey). Amy herself said the book wasn't at all what she was expecting, although Mike and I were a bit more enthusiastic about the story.
Despite the book's genuine weirdness, Jones does some really interesting things with this narrative. At the beginning, 17-year-old Sophie is cursed to be an old woman by the Witch of the Waste. Hoping to beat the curse, Sophie journeys away from her family hat shop and encounters the titular moving castle, owned by the simultaneously charming and cold wizard Howl Jenkins. Howl has struck an agreement with a fire demon named Calcifer, and they live in the castle with Howl's apprentice, the kind-hearted Michael. A lot of weird and convoluted adventures happen, lives are imperiled, and hearts are won. I had a little trouble following the plot at times, but the strength of the characters - Sophie and Howl in particular - made up for the structural shortcomings.
Our club found the book a little hard to discuss. I'm not sure why we had so much trouble finding interesting things to say about Howl's Moving Castle, but alas so it was. (Admittedly, our giddiness - a book club trait that is always getting us into trouble - did not help matters). We all agreed that there is something kind of fascinating about this material, and we all had trouble believing that this book could actually be considered a children's book rather than a YA novel.
Personally, I am obsessed with some of the romance novel tropes Jones is playing with here, although I don't think she meant to do such a thing. Howl is a very typical romance novel hero, just a few years younger. He's a little cold-hearted but also charms the pants off women. He loves his family but is also unsure of his place in their lives. He has a love/hate relationship with the heroine (Sophie). He is "reformed" (kind of) by the end. Sophie defies the romance heroine type because of her old-age curse and prickly personality, but by the end, she's fulfilled the dutiful heroine role of reformer-of-man. To see this all happen in a kid's book kind of blew my mind, to be honest. I will definitely be giving it more thought throughout the future.
Up next for Book Club Revisited: It's Corey's turn again, and he chose Karen Thompson Walker's new book, The Age of Miracles. I'm excited, as I was planning to read it anyway. We also added an additional goal of discussing the film Melancholia, as it shares some end-of-the-world themes with Walker's book. Should be a good time.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Could Have Used More Changlings
Book Reviewed: Some Kind of Fairy Tale, by Graham Joyce
When I was a kid, I hated fantasy. I had absolutely no tolerance for magic or mysticism or anything that wasn't completely tactile. Sure, I could watch a Disney movie and be perfectly happy. But when it came to playing or reading, it was reality or nothing. I realize now just how weird that is. Most people enjoy fantasy as children and then grow out of it. Instead, I grew into an appreciation for the fantastical after college. After discovering a love for urban fantasy and mash-ups (in particular, Neil Gaiman's novels for both adults and children), I began to open up to the genre a bit more.
That being said, there are some fantasy tropes I will never love. One of those is the idea of fairies. They bore me, and the whole concept always creeps up on the border of being cutesy. So when I read a good review for Graham Joyce's new book, Some Kind of Fairy Tale, I assumed it wouldn't be for me. After all, this book is deep in the fairy stuff. But the fact that the book was about the aftermath of a tragic disappearance got to me, and I went ahead and read it in a couple days. And while I actually did like the book, I had this weird feeling that my worst beliefs in the silliness of fairy-fantasies might just still hold true.
Here's the problem. In blending the almost-boring realm of domesticity with the out-there fantasy world of woodland sprites, Joyce is attempting to say all sorts of semi-profound things about humaniy. But in the long run, I am always going to be more interested in the domestic. As a kid who used to re-enact the most boring scenes from film and television (the part of Mister Rogers where he changes his sweater, the opening of The Little Mermaid where Sebastian lays out his music score on a rock), I am still more interested in the emotional significance of the day-to-day drama of human life than I am in the strange things we can't actually see. It's not that I don't like a touch of supernatural in my life (I am all for ghosts and Harry Potter and whatnot), but the fantasy has to be interesting to me. And again, fairies just aren't interesting in Bethland.
Some Kind of Fairy Tale begins with the return of Tara, who disappeared as a teenager twenty years earlier. She comes back to her parents and now middle-aged brother, Peter, looking almost exactly the same as she did two decades ago. She was kidnapped by fairies, she claims. And now she's back. The book deals with this dramatic return in a fairly realistic way - Tara's parents are glad she's back and are trying to avoid the drama of knowing where she really was, Peter is concerned about the truth and takes his sister to a psychiatrist. The relationships between people really count here, especially Tara and Peter's relationship with Richie, a down-and-out musician who once dated Tara and was Peter's best friend before her disappearance. Richie is the book's most interesting character (although I quite liked Peter as well), although Joyce doesn't flesh him out as much as I would have liked.
Joyce does do a few interesting things here. For one, he never tells the reader what to think or believe, which adds genuine tension to the plot. He also does a good job in using Peter's family life as an entry point for the story. His son Jack plays an important role as a kind of reader/writer surrogate, and by making Peter a farrier who lives in a cottage, Joyce gets extra mileage in his concept of the modern fairy tale. Most importantly, he makes a sort of beautiful and unsaid claim at the end about what the passage of time does to the ones we love. Every body changes, and if you don't see someone for a long period of time, even a lover or child or friend can become a complete stranger. Strangely enough, I think Joyce could have used the idea of a changling - a creature taking the place of a real person, also related to fairy legend - to a larger degree. He makes the point quite well, but the book's ending left me feeling a little unsure of what just happened. I wanted more closure, and I can't decide if Joyce should have given it to us or not.
This book is so close to being really good and original, but it never quites get there. Joyce uses too many points-of-view, too many voices to get his story across. And by making Tara so mysterious, he makes her a bit annoying as a character. We can't know her because to know her would be to figure her out, and the story won't let that happen. I think the things Joyce does well - the domestic stuff, the theme of loved ones changing over time, etc - he does really well. I just wish the book had felt a little more substantial by the end. I think I've had my fill of fairies for awhile.
When I was a kid, I hated fantasy. I had absolutely no tolerance for magic or mysticism or anything that wasn't completely tactile. Sure, I could watch a Disney movie and be perfectly happy. But when it came to playing or reading, it was reality or nothing. I realize now just how weird that is. Most people enjoy fantasy as children and then grow out of it. Instead, I grew into an appreciation for the fantastical after college. After discovering a love for urban fantasy and mash-ups (in particular, Neil Gaiman's novels for both adults and children), I began to open up to the genre a bit more.
That being said, there are some fantasy tropes I will never love. One of those is the idea of fairies. They bore me, and the whole concept always creeps up on the border of being cutesy. So when I read a good review for Graham Joyce's new book, Some Kind of Fairy Tale, I assumed it wouldn't be for me. After all, this book is deep in the fairy stuff. But the fact that the book was about the aftermath of a tragic disappearance got to me, and I went ahead and read it in a couple days. And while I actually did like the book, I had this weird feeling that my worst beliefs in the silliness of fairy-fantasies might just still hold true.
Here's the problem. In blending the almost-boring realm of domesticity with the out-there fantasy world of woodland sprites, Joyce is attempting to say all sorts of semi-profound things about humaniy. But in the long run, I am always going to be more interested in the domestic. As a kid who used to re-enact the most boring scenes from film and television (the part of Mister Rogers where he changes his sweater, the opening of The Little Mermaid where Sebastian lays out his music score on a rock), I am still more interested in the emotional significance of the day-to-day drama of human life than I am in the strange things we can't actually see. It's not that I don't like a touch of supernatural in my life (I am all for ghosts and Harry Potter and whatnot), but the fantasy has to be interesting to me. And again, fairies just aren't interesting in Bethland.
Some Kind of Fairy Tale begins with the return of Tara, who disappeared as a teenager twenty years earlier. She comes back to her parents and now middle-aged brother, Peter, looking almost exactly the same as she did two decades ago. She was kidnapped by fairies, she claims. And now she's back. The book deals with this dramatic return in a fairly realistic way - Tara's parents are glad she's back and are trying to avoid the drama of knowing where she really was, Peter is concerned about the truth and takes his sister to a psychiatrist. The relationships between people really count here, especially Tara and Peter's relationship with Richie, a down-and-out musician who once dated Tara and was Peter's best friend before her disappearance. Richie is the book's most interesting character (although I quite liked Peter as well), although Joyce doesn't flesh him out as much as I would have liked.
Joyce does do a few interesting things here. For one, he never tells the reader what to think or believe, which adds genuine tension to the plot. He also does a good job in using Peter's family life as an entry point for the story. His son Jack plays an important role as a kind of reader/writer surrogate, and by making Peter a farrier who lives in a cottage, Joyce gets extra mileage in his concept of the modern fairy tale. Most importantly, he makes a sort of beautiful and unsaid claim at the end about what the passage of time does to the ones we love. Every body changes, and if you don't see someone for a long period of time, even a lover or child or friend can become a complete stranger. Strangely enough, I think Joyce could have used the idea of a changling - a creature taking the place of a real person, also related to fairy legend - to a larger degree. He makes the point quite well, but the book's ending left me feeling a little unsure of what just happened. I wanted more closure, and I can't decide if Joyce should have given it to us or not.
This book is so close to being really good and original, but it never quites get there. Joyce uses too many points-of-view, too many voices to get his story across. And by making Tara so mysterious, he makes her a bit annoying as a character. We can't know her because to know her would be to figure her out, and the story won't let that happen. I think the things Joyce does well - the domestic stuff, the theme of loved ones changing over time, etc - he does really well. I just wish the book had felt a little more substantial by the end. I think I've had my fill of fairies for awhile.
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This Week in Trashy Reads 2012 #7
Trashy Read 2012 #7: Practice Makes Perfect, by Julie James
I’ve been watching a lot of TV shows about lawyers lately, so it only makes sense that I would choose to read a Julie James book as my next romance. James was a lawyer before she began writing screenplays and novels, and almost all of her books feature lawyers (and the one book that doesn’t feature a lawyer protagonist, A Lot Like Love, still revolves around a legal case). James has gotten a lot of love in the contemporary romance world for writing books that feature adults with real jobs and actual common sense. Also, she’s great at banter. Her characters always act as if they’ve stepped right off a screen, walking and talking and trading insults and innuendos with one another.
I’ve been watching a lot of TV shows about lawyers lately, so it only makes sense that I would choose to read a Julie James book as my next romance. James was a lawyer before she began writing screenplays and novels, and almost all of her books feature lawyers (and the one book that doesn’t feature a lawyer protagonist, A Lot Like Love, still revolves around a legal case). James has gotten a lot of love in the contemporary romance world for writing books that feature adults with real jobs and actual common sense. Also, she’s great at banter. Her characters always act as if they’ve stepped right off a screen, walking and talking and trading insults and innuendos with one another.
Practice Makes Perfect was James’s second novel, one that I
hadn’t previously gotten around to reading.
It features that much-beloved trope of the relationship that begins with
hate and ends with true love. Payton and
J.D. both work at a big-deal Chicago law firm, and both of them expect to make
partner within the next few weeks.
Despite working together for eight years, they strongly dislike one
another, constantly bickering out of ear’s reach of their coworkers. Then they find out that the firm has decided
to only make one of them partner, despite pairing them up together in order to
win over a major new client. Obviously,
this means Payton and J.D. become even more competitive, which is inconvenient
in light of the fact they are both gaining more respect for each other.
I liked Practice Makes Perfect quite a bit. It’s funny and breezy, and the central plot
of the partnership is an actual conflict that doesn’t seem designed solely to
keep our couple apart for a few more pages.
You can actually imagine that this is the kind of thing that would be
detrimental to a burgeoning relationship, one that the characters genuinely
care about. Once again, James has
created characters who have a real problem that they try to solve in
both a professionally- and emotionally-sound way. Yes, there is a great deal of reader wish-fulfillment
happening here (these characters are smart, attractive, have good jobs, and are
absolutely loaded), but the story isn’t designed to be anything more than
breezy summer fare anyway. And that’s
exactly what it was for me.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Poetry Round-Up
Books Reviewed: The Trees The Trees, by Heather Christle; Thin Kimono, by Michael Earl Craig; I [Heart] Your Fate, by Anthony McCann
I read so much poetry these days that I can't possibly blog about each book. So every once in a while, I do these round-ups to let you know what I've been reading lately. Here are three books I've read in the last couple weeks:
The Trees The Trees: After reading and loving Christle's The Difficult Farm a couple weeks ago, I gave another of her books a try. And of course, I really liked it. I'm not sure The Trees The Trees is quite as surprising or charming as The Difficult Farm, but the way it teases out an idiosyncratic voice through the pages of prose poems is really cool. Again, I find Christle to be a warm and available poetic voice, one that I will probably be recommending to those who think contemporary poetry has gotten overly cold in its obsession with being clever. Poems I particularly liked here: "Anywhere in Particular," "A Handle on It," "Line Up in an Orderly Fashion," "Landscaping," "I Know the Air Should Not Contain Me," and "Trying to Return the Sun."
Thin Kimono: Another book from the pile my friend Drew left for me this summer. Craig is definitely unlike any other poet out there right now, probably because he lives and works in Montana as a farrier. He has a very plain, conversant style, one which spins out poems as if they were folk stories. On the surface, what could look like a prosaic quality is actually quite robust in its ability to do that which makes good poetry - to convey many things, to carry many ideas, in a handful of lines. Thin Kimono is unlike anything else I've read this summer, which is good. I need some change in my life. Poems I particularly liked here: "Bluebirds," "When It's Time," "Bubbles Came from Their Noses," "Games in the Sand," and "City at Night."
I [Heart] Your Fate: Again, another book by an author I read and liked earlier this summer (in this case, the earlier book was McCann's Father of Noise). I [Heart] Your Fate was particularly hit and miss for me. I really liked some of the poems, I instantly forgot some of the others; this dynamic is defining my relationship with McCann, I think. I did gain a new appreciation for McCann's style here, though. He has a sense of sound, of how a line works with the one before and after it, that is quite masterful. This is particularly on display in the long poems in the middle of the book, which have a wonderful rhythm to them. Poems I particularly liked here: "Field Work," "Letters of Claire and Trelawny," "Deseret," "Mammal Island," and "More Dreams of Waking."
I read so much poetry these days that I can't possibly blog about each book. So every once in a while, I do these round-ups to let you know what I've been reading lately. Here are three books I've read in the last couple weeks:
The Trees The Trees: After reading and loving Christle's The Difficult Farm a couple weeks ago, I gave another of her books a try. And of course, I really liked it. I'm not sure The Trees The Trees is quite as surprising or charming as The Difficult Farm, but the way it teases out an idiosyncratic voice through the pages of prose poems is really cool. Again, I find Christle to be a warm and available poetic voice, one that I will probably be recommending to those who think contemporary poetry has gotten overly cold in its obsession with being clever. Poems I particularly liked here: "Anywhere in Particular," "A Handle on It," "Line Up in an Orderly Fashion," "Landscaping," "I Know the Air Should Not Contain Me," and "Trying to Return the Sun."
Thin Kimono: Another book from the pile my friend Drew left for me this summer. Craig is definitely unlike any other poet out there right now, probably because he lives and works in Montana as a farrier. He has a very plain, conversant style, one which spins out poems as if they were folk stories. On the surface, what could look like a prosaic quality is actually quite robust in its ability to do that which makes good poetry - to convey many things, to carry many ideas, in a handful of lines. Thin Kimono is unlike anything else I've read this summer, which is good. I need some change in my life. Poems I particularly liked here: "Bluebirds," "When It's Time," "Bubbles Came from Their Noses," "Games in the Sand," and "City at Night."
I [Heart] Your Fate: Again, another book by an author I read and liked earlier this summer (in this case, the earlier book was McCann's Father of Noise). I [Heart] Your Fate was particularly hit and miss for me. I really liked some of the poems, I instantly forgot some of the others; this dynamic is defining my relationship with McCann, I think. I did gain a new appreciation for McCann's style here, though. He has a sense of sound, of how a line works with the one before and after it, that is quite masterful. This is particularly on display in the long poems in the middle of the book, which have a wonderful rhythm to them. Poems I particularly liked here: "Field Work," "Letters of Claire and Trelawny," "Deseret," "Mammal Island," and "More Dreams of Waking."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)